More than a decade after Freeport adopted its Residential Rental Property Regulation Ordinance, new data reveals hundreds of suspected rental properties may still be operating outside the city’s registration system. While supporters argue the ordinance has improved tenant protections and neighborhood accountability, critics say weak enforcement and uneven compliance continue to undermine its effectiveness.

In a sharply divided 5–3 vote, the Freeport City Council approved Ordinance 2025-37, a sweeping overhaul of council rules that critics warn dramatically expands the power of Mayor Jodi Miller and the council majority. Supporters say the changes modernize government operations and improve efficiency, while opponents argue the ordinance restricts dissent, limits public accountability, and fundamentally reshapes how local democracy functions inside City Hall.

The Freeport City Council has approved revised garbage collection rates through 2028, lowering previously planned increases after officials cited strong reserve balances in the city’s Health and Environment Fund. While the move could eventually reduce future costs for residents, questions are already emerging about why utility overcollections occurred in the first place — and whether the timing is connected to rumors of future tax increases elsewhere.

Freeport’s Chapter 422 traffic ordinance lays out the rules governing everything from citations and accident reports to driver accountability and enforcement authority. While many provisions promote public safety and due process, critics argue portions of the ordinance place too much burden on vehicle owners, lack clear appeal mechanisms, and fail to reflect modern standards for transparency, technology, and equitable enforcement.

Just days after hundreds marched through Freeport during the “No Kings” protest condemning authoritarianism and abuses of power, critics are asking whether those same concerns now apply to City Hall itself. As the Freeport City Council prepares to vote on controversial changes to its governing rules, opponents warn Ordinance 2025-37 could dramatically restrict dissent, consolidate power within the city’s leadership, and reshape how public debate is allowed to occur in local government.

After months of delays and mounting criticism, the City of Freeport has finally announced the start of its 2025 Street Program. But instead of easing concerns, the limited rollout has intensified questions about missing tax dollars, scaled-back project plans, and whether residents were misled about how the city’s controversial 1% sales tax increase would actually be used.

One year after Freeport residents approved a controversial 1% sales tax increase meant to rebuild the city’s failing roads, growing questions remain about where the money has gone — and why promised street projects still haven’t begun. Public records reviewed by Fighting4Freeport show millions flowing through the Street Improvement Fund, significant payments to engineering firm Fehr Graham, and a widening gap between what taxpayers were promised and what they’ve actually received.

A controversial proposal to rewrite Freeport City Council’s governing rules is drawing fierce backlash from residents and critics who warn the changes would dramatically expand the power of Mayor Jodi Miller and City Manager Rob Boyer while weakening transparency, debate, and minority representation. Opponents argue Ordinance 2025-37 is not about efficiency, but about consolidating control over Freeport’s legislative process and silencing dissenting voices inside City Hall.

As Freeport’s June 9, 2025 Committee of the Whole meeting approaches, critics warn the City Council may be nearing its last opportunity for unrestricted public debate before proposed rule changes hand greater control to Mayor Jodi Miller and her allies. Questions surrounding stalled infrastructure projects, missing campaign promises, and millions generated by the city’s controversial 1% sales tax are expected to dominate discussion as tensions over transparency and accountability continue to rise at City Hall.

Questions are mounting in Freeport after Mayor Jodi Miller’s administration quietly placed a permit request tied to Tutty Baker Fest into the City Council’s consent agenda during the June 2 meeting, avoiding separate public debate and scrutiny. Critics argue the move shielded discussion about the city’s use of taxpayer-funded staff, equipment, and resources for an event operated by Freeport Festivals Inc. — a private organization founded and run by the Mayor herself.

A packed City Hall chamber on June 2, 2025, signaled a turning point in Freeport politics as residents from across the community gathered to challenge controversial council actions, defend public accountability, and make their voices heard. With tensions surrounding the disputed May 19 meeting still unresolved, citizens stepped forward to confront proposed rule changes, a censure resolution targeting alderpersons, and what many described as an alarming attempt to silence dissent at City Hall.

As Freeport moves forward with a nearly $60 million wastewater treatment plant upgrade led by Fehr Graham, residents in nearby Shannon say their own experience with the engineering firm should serve as a warning. Despite years of construction, millions in taxpayer-backed loans, and repeated assurances from officials, many Shannon residents say they still do not trust the quality of their water — raising growing concerns about whether Freeport is heading down the same costly path.

Freeport’s City Council heads into a potentially explosive Monday night meeting as officials prepare to debate the legality of the controversial May 19, 2025 council session, consider a resolution to censure three alderpersons, and vote on millions in public spending and infrastructure contracts. At the center of the debate is a critical question: should Freeport follow its own municipal code on quorum requirements, or rely on broader state law interpretations that could reshape local governance moving forward?